6 capsules · 6 verdict types

Demo Gallery

Real GitHub contributors with their consent. Click any card to see the full capsule render — same view a hiring client gets via tokenized share link.

By verdict type

Senior IC · Backend

Maya Chen

🟢 AI-fluent

Distributed indexing service. Rich CLAUDE.md (52 specific rules), spec/code coordinated commits, PR comments cite Copilot review.

Staff IC · Infrastructure

Erin Wallace

🟢 Strong craft · AI signal n/a

10+ years OSS contributions, deep refactor history. No AI artifacts visible — recruiter judgment whether AI fluency matters.

Senior IC · Full-stack

Daniel Torres

🟡 Promising · needs depth probe

Strong React/TypeScript work, but backend depth not evidenced. Worth a system-design probe specific to the gap.

Mid-Senior · Backend

Priya Sharma

🟡 AI use, craft gaps

Heavy Cursor usage in commits, but module boundaries unclear, no tests at seams. AI use can amplify weak architecture.

Senior IC · Frontend

Marcus Rivera

🔴 Craft concerns

Tangled component hierarchy, no test coverage, repeated bug-fix cycles. Concern is craftsmanship — independent of AI.

VP Engineering

Jordan Patel

⚪ Insufficient evidence

Last public commit 2019. Most recent work in private GitLab/internal repos. Recommend live coding session or reference deep-dive.

How to use

Each capsule above is a real run on a real candidate

The verdict, atom answers, and anchor evidence are exactly what a recruiter would see after running their own candidate. The hiring client (your customer) sees the same artifact via tokenized share link.

Ready to run on your candidate? Single capsule starts at $29, no subscription.